<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Truth in New Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomtoronto.ca/the-new-truth-in-new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomtoronto.ca/the-new-truth-in-new-media/</link>
	<description>Tom "Toronto" Reidt on Public Relations and other rambling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomToronto</title>
		<link>http://tomtoronto.ca/the-new-truth-in-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>TomToronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomtoronto.ca/?p=49#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Hi Ferg, 

Thanks for your comment! Conversation is definitely the focus point here, and it&#039;s a shame so few companies are getting involved. It&#039;s been said before, the conversation is going to happen with or without the organization, and to me it seems foolish to ignore it. 

When to engage is a tricky situation, and I think you&#039;ve really got it right over at Molson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ferg, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment! Conversation is definitely the focus point here, and it&#8217;s a shame so few companies are getting involved. It&#8217;s been said before, the conversation is going to happen with or without the organization, and to me it seems foolish to ignore it. </p>
<p>When to engage is a tricky situation, and I think you&#8217;ve really got it right over at Molson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferg Devins</title>
		<link>http://tomtoronto.ca/the-new-truth-in-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferg Devins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomtoronto.ca/?p=49#comment-653</guid>
		<description>Tom...really appreciate where you are coming from here. It&#039;s fascinating to see that those on the side of social media certainly see the value and acceptance of &quot;dialogue&quot; on issues vs the old tried and true traditional media &quot;coverage&quot; of the story...and then history passes by. In social media the conversation is what becomes robust. To your point...companies need to mindful of these conversations taking place and then determine when they engage. In our case we intervene or interupt when there is misleading information or non fact based opinion. Molson totally respects the opinions of others...and in fact we may agree to disagree...its the facts that need to be portrayed and put forth for the balance of story with that of opinion...cheers !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8230;really appreciate where you are coming from here. It&#8217;s fascinating to see that those on the side of social media certainly see the value and acceptance of &#8220;dialogue&#8221; on issues vs the old tried and true traditional media &#8220;coverage&#8221; of the story&#8230;and then history passes by. In social media the conversation is what becomes robust. To your point&#8230;companies need to mindful of these conversations taking place and then determine when they engage. In our case we intervene or interupt when there is misleading information or non fact based opinion. Molson totally respects the opinions of others&#8230;and in fact we may agree to disagree&#8230;its the facts that need to be portrayed and put forth for the balance of story with that of opinion&#8230;cheers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
